Ashley P

  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Ashley P

  • Rank
    Distinguished member

Recent Profile Visitors

6,092 profile views
  1. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a password protected forum. Enter Password
  2. 2010 Camaro SS

    IF the duty cycle of the fuel pump is near 100% at 43 psi, what good will asking for more pressure do? Will that be OK with non- E-85?
  3. 2010 Camaro SS

    Is it the correct size? Was an incorrect tool used to disassemble possibly "springing" the tabs?
  4. Random thought thread

    My sentiments when burning leaded fuel.
  5. Ridgid pipe thread head

    Ridgid model 811 die head w/4 dies. $200 Similar to the 811a model on amazon:
  6. NewER DD 2015 Mustang GT

    Matt, how's your car hook on the street compared to those vids at the Hill?
  7. Auto trans...adapt values

    Well, truck is gone for today. But earlier I did disconnect it, engine ran fine, trans shifted hard. PCS amp request was 0, so my assumption is it was in "limp mode" due to MAF open circuit. I don't think fuel trims were out, but this project has stretched for weeks with an hour here, hour there. I coulda missed that. Because I have a MAF from my 07 5.3 afm Avalanche, I'm wanna plug it up and make sure it runs/shifts the same.
  8. Auto trans...adapt values

    The jasper tech guy is trying to help me, but he's about as far behind me as I am behind you. He's trying to tell me the MAF is the major input for shift firmness and they've seen MAFs cause a 2-3 flare. How likely is a MAF to blame?
  9. Random thought thread

    Where's the X pipe in this discussion?
  10. Auto trans...adapt values

    07 Suburban, 4wd, 5.3 afm
  11. Auto trans...adapt values

    Well, just drove the truck, TAP values are carried out to the thousandth, so it makes sense that's a factor not a psi. So I'm gonna bark up the tree from your perspective. Many thanks!
  12. Random thought thread

    ^ The JohnC fix applied.
  13. Auto trans...adapt values

    Still, if good shifts are measured at about .5/sec long, how can a slipping shift that OBVIOUSLY (to the driver) takes much longer be measured at .3/sec?? That does not make sense to me. But, if that's what's happening, then every other goofy thing DOES make sense (the commanded reduction in pressure, the accompanying flare). I thank you for though provoking replies. Maybe I'm also fighting tunnel vision. I'll try to regroup, doubt my previous thoughts, and come at it from your perspective that the computer is actually trying to shift harder. (That runs me into the problem of why doesn't it add a little more pressure and stop the flare?)
  14. Auto trans...adapt values

    What about the SnapOn scanner is wrong? What if the TCM "thinks" it's shifting faster than commanded? I believe that's what's happening. The TCM measures a slipping/flaring shift at .3 of a second, yet a normal shift is .5 second. The flaring shift is taking waaayyyy longer than the .5 second.